Fact-Checking Policy
https://edpl.in/ Fact-Checking and Verification Policy
Last Updated: August 2025
At https://edpl.in/, we are committed to providing our readers with accurate, reliable, and well-researched information. This Fact-Checking Policy outlines our comprehensive approach to ensuring the accuracy and credibility of all content published on our website.
Our Commitment to Accuracy
Core Principles
- Truth and Accuracy: We prioritize factual accuracy in all our content
- Transparency: We are open about our sources and methodology
- Accountability: We take responsibility for errors and correct them promptly
- Independence: Our fact-checking process is independent of external influences
- Continuous Improvement: We regularly review and enhance our verification procedures
Fact-Checking Methodology
1. Source Verification
Primary Sources
- Official Manufacturer Websites: For product specifications and launch information
- Government Websites: For policy updates and official announcements
- Press Releases: Direct from companies and government agencies
- Official Statistics: From recognized statistical organizations
Secondary Sources
- Reputable News Organizations: Established media outlets with strong editorial standards
- Industry Publications: Specialized automotive and technology publications
- Expert Opinions: Quotes and insights from industry experts and analysts
- Academic Research: Peer-reviewed studies and research papers when applicable
Source Credibility Assessment
We evaluate sources based on:
- Editorial standards and reputation
- Transparency of information
- Track record of accuracy
- Potential conflicts of interest
- Date and relevance of information
2. Multi-Source Verification
Cross-Verification Process
- Multiple Sources: We verify important facts through at least two independent sources
- Conflicting Information: When sources disagree, we investigate further or note the discrepancy
- Expert Consultation: We consult industry experts for complex technical matters
- Official Confirmation: We seek official confirmation for significant claims when possible
3. Product Review Verification
Technical Specifications
- Manufacturer Data: We verify specifications against official manufacturer information
- Industry Databases: We cross-check against recognized automotive and technology databases
- Hands-on Testing: When possible, we conduct direct testing and evaluation
- Expert Reviews: We consider reviews from established automotive and tech experts
Pricing Information
- Official Pricing: We verify prices through official dealer networks and manufacturer websites
- Market Research: We check multiple sources for pricing accuracy
- Regional Variations: We note pricing differences across markets
- Regular Updates: We update pricing information when significant changes occur
4. Government Policy Verification
Official Sources
- Government Websites: We use official government portals and publications
- Legislative Documents: We reference actual bills, amendments, and official notifications
- Press Conferences: We verify information from official government press releases
- Regulatory Bodies: We consult relevant regulatory agencies for policy details
Implementation Timeline
- Official Announcements: We verify implementation dates through official channels
- Previous Policy Changes: We reference historical patterns for context
- Regional Variations: We note differences in implementation across states or regions
Editorial Review Process
1. Initial Research Phase
- Writers conduct preliminary research using approved sources
- Initial fact-checking occurs during the writing process
- Sources are documented and linked where appropriate
- Questionable information is flagged for additional verification
2. Editorial Review
- Content Review: Senior editors review all content for accuracy and completeness
- Source Verification: Editors verify the credibility and accuracy of cited sources
- Fact Verification: Key facts are double-checked against primary sources
- Context Check: Information is reviewed for proper context and potential misinterpretation
3. Publication Standards
- Attribution: All sources are properly attributed
- Disclaimer Addition: Appropriate disclaimers are added when necessary
- Update Dates: Publication and last updated dates are clearly marked
- Contact Information: Readers can contact us for fact-checking concerns
Specific Content Categories
Automotive Reviews
Verification Standards:
- Engine specifications verified through manufacturer data
- Safety ratings confirmed through official testing organizations
- Pricing verified through authorized dealers
- Launch dates confirmed through official announcements
- Features and options verified through official product literature
Mobile Phone Reviews
Verification Standards:
- Technical specifications verified through manufacturer websites
- Performance claims checked against official benchmarks
- Pricing verified through official retailers and carrier websites
- Launch availability confirmed through official channels
- Software features verified through hands-on testing or official documentation
Government Policy Articles
Verification Standards:
- Policy details verified through official government sources
- Implementation dates confirmed through official notifications
- Impact analysis based on expert opinions and historical precedent
- Regional variations noted and verified
- Updates tracked through official government communications
Error Correction Process
Error Identification
How We Identify Errors:
- Internal editorial review
- Reader feedback and corrections
- Source updates and new information
- Third-party fact-checking alerts
- Regular content audits
Correction Procedure
When Errors Are Identified:
- Immediate Assessment: We quickly assess the severity and impact of the error
- Source Verification: We verify the correct information through reliable sources
- Content Update: We update the content with correct information
- Correction Notice: We add a correction notice when significant errors are corrected
- Reader Notification: We may notify readers of significant corrections through appropriate channels
Correction Standards
- Transparency: All corrections are clearly marked and explained
- Timeliness: Minor errors are corrected within 24 hours, major errors immediately
- Attribution: We credit readers or sources who identify errors
- Archive: We maintain a record of significant corrections for transparency
Reader Involvement
Reporting Errors
How Readers Can Help:
- Email Contact: Send corrections to Sandeepbishnoi5781@gmail.com
- Specific Information: Include article title, date, and specific error details
- Source Information: Provide credible sources supporting the correction
- Contact Information: Include your contact details for follow-up if necessary
Feedback Process
- Acknowledgment: We acknowledge all error reports within 24 hours
- Investigation: We investigate all reported errors thoroughly
- Response: We respond to readers with our findings and any actions taken
- Credit: We credit readers who help us improve our accuracy
External Fact-Checking
Third-Party Verification
When appropriate, we may:
- Consult external fact-checking organizations
- Seek expert opinions from industry professionals
- Collaborate with other reputable publications for verification
- Use fact-checking tools and databases
Industry Standards
We follow fact-checking standards established by:
- International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) principles
- Industry best practices for journalism and content creation
- Academic standards for research and verification
- Legal standards for accuracy and liability
Technology and Tools
Fact-Checking Tools
We utilize various tools and technologies:
- Reverse Image Search: To verify the authenticity of images
- Source Verification Tools: To check the credibility of online sources
- Database Access: To verify technical specifications and data
- Archive Services: To track changes in official information over time
Data Management
- Source Documentation: We maintain detailed records of all sources used
- Version Control: We track changes and updates to articles
- Backup Verification: We keep backup verification for important claims
- Audit Trail: We maintain an audit trail for all fact-checking activities
Training and Standards
Editorial Team Training
Our editorial team receives training in:
- Fact-checking methodologies and best practices
- Source evaluation and verification techniques
- Bias recognition and mitigation
- Legal and ethical standards for content creation
- Technology tools for fact-checking and verification
Continuous Education
- Regular updates on fact-checking best practices
- Industry-specific training for automotive and technology content
- Legal updates affecting content creation and verification
- Technology training for new fact-checking tools and methods
Limitations and Disclaimers
Scope of Fact-Checking
What We Fact-Check:
- Product specifications and technical details
- Pricing and availability information
- Government policy details and implementation timelines
- Company announcements and launch information
- Historical facts and timeline information
Limitations:
Opinions: We fact-check factual claims but